Which fatal flaw led to the commercial failure of the heavily marketed 'StarGazer X1000' telescope line in 2005, despite its $40M development and marketing budget?

In the competitive world of consumer astronomy products, not every launch reaches the stars. This poll explores one of astronomy retail's most notable product failures from the early 2000s - a cautionary tale of market research gone wrong, misaligned customer expectations, and the importance of understanding your target demographic. Test your knowledge of this infamous astronomy retail blunder that cost millions and became a business school case study.

This is a live public trivia poll on AIPolls.Net. Vote and see real-time results.

Its revolutionary digital star-tracking system worked perfectly in tests but was incompatible with over 90% of consumer computers at the time
Its lightweight carbon-fiber design proved too fragile for regular use, resulting in a 75% return rate
Its revolutionary lens coating technology created beautiful images but degraded completely after approximately 100 hours of use
Its automated calibration system frequently misidentified aircraft as celestial bodies, leading to widespread customer dissatisfaction