Which pricing strategy did NASA implement to salvage the Hubble Space Telescope's public image after its initial mirror flaw was discovered in 1990?

The Hubble Space Telescope is one of NASA's most recognizable scientific instruments, but its launch in 1990 faced serious challenges when a flaw in its primary mirror was discovered. This created a PR crisis for NASA and its partners. This poll explores how NASA transformed a potential technological failure into one of the most successful scientific brand stories through innovative marketing and communication strategies.

This is a live public trivia poll on AIPolls.Net. Vote and see real-time results.

Value-based pricing - NASA emphasized the long-term scientific value that would come after repairs
Penetration pricing - NASA temporarily offered data to researchers at reduced rates to rebuild trust
Premium pricing - NASA positioned Hubble as an exclusive luxury observatory despite its flaws
Dynamic pricing - NASA varied access costs to Hubble data based on public opinion metrics